题目

题型：不详难度：来源：

第二节：书面表达（满分25分）
最近，关于“高中是否该取消文理分科”的网上调查吸引了26万余网民的积极参与。

	赞同文理分科（46%）	不赞同文理分科（54%）
理由	如不分科，文、理都要学，增加了学生负担。	如分科，学生知识面窄，不利于学生的发展。

 
请根据所给的信息写一篇英文报道，描述被调查者的不同看法，并表明你的看法。
注意：词数120左右，文章开头已给出（不计入词数）。
Recently more than 260,000 netizens have participated in the survey about whether the curriculum of senior high school should be divided into arts and science。            
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

答案

One possible version:
Recently more than 260,000 netizens have participated in the survey about whether the curriculum (课程) of senior high school should be divided into arts and science.
About 46% of the netizens are in favor of the idea that the curriculum should be divided into arts and science. Otherwise, students may have too much to learn, which increases their burden greatly. However, about 54% of the netizens think that it is unwise to get arts and science separated. They believe that it is not good for students" full development and that they may have a narrow knowledge.
In my opinion, the problem does not lie in whether the curriculum should be divided or not. Actually, some students spend their time and energy mostly on either arts or science, which may have a bad effect on their future. So I would like to suggest that the college entrance examination should be reformed.

解析

略