题目
题型:不详难度:来源:
Even better, Paley"s Remote Scanning Services Company could detect crop problems before they became visible to the eye. Mounted on a plane flown at 3,000 feet at night, an infrared scanner measured the heat emitted by crops. The data were transformed into a colourcoded map showing where plants were running “fevers”. Farmers could then spotspray, using 50 to 70 percent less pesticide than they otherwise would.
The bad news is that Paley"s company closed down in 1984, after only three years. Farmers resisted the new technology and longterm backers were hard to find. But with the renewed concern about pesticides on produce, and refinements in infrared scanning, Paley hopes to get back into operation. Agriculture experts have no doubt the technology works. “This technique can be used on 75 percent of agricultural land in the United States, ” says George Oerther of Texas A & M. Ray Jackson, who recently retired from the Department of Agriculture, thinks remote infrared crop scanning could be adopted by the end of the decade. But only if Paley finds the financial backing which he failed to obtain 10 years ago.
小题1:Plants will send out an increased amount of heat when they are________.
A.facing an infrared scanner |
B.sprayed with pesticides |
C.in poor physical condition |
D.exposed to excessive sun rays |
A.estimate the damage to the crops |
B.draw a colourcoded map |
C.measure the size of the affected area |
D.locate the problem area |
A.resorting to spotspraying |
B.transforming poisoned rain |
C.consulting infrared scanning experts |
D.detecting crop problems at an early stage |
A.its high cost |
B.the lack of official support |
C.the lack of financial support |
D.its failure to help increase production |
答案
小题1:C
小题2:D
小题3:A
小题4:C
解析
小题1:C 推理题。根据文章第一段可知当植物的情况不理想如受到昆虫的袭击的时候,也会生病,故C正确。
小题2:D 细节题。根据第2段3,4,5三行The data were transformed into a colourcoded map showing where plants were running “fevers”. Farmers could then spotspray, using 50 to 70 percent less pesticide than they otherwise would.可知这种扫描仪可以确定出问题的具体位置,可以定点喷洒农药,故D正确。
小题3:A 细节题。根据第2段3,4,5三行The data were transformed into a colourcoded map showing where plants were running “fevers”. Farmers could then spotspray, using 50 to 70 percent less pesticide than they otherwise would可知A正确。
小题4:C 推理题。根据最后一句可知C正确。
核心考点
试题【Even plants can run a fever, especially when they"re under attack by insects or 】;主要考察你对题材分类等知识点的理解。[详细]
举一反三
While attractiveness is a positive factor for a man on his way up the executive ladder,it is harmful to a woman.
Handsome male executives were thought as having more integrity than plainer men;effort and ability were thought to account for their success.
Attractive female executives were considered to have less integrity than unattractive ones;their success was attributed not to ability but to factors such as luck.
All unattractive women executives were thought to have more integrity and to be more capable than the attractive female executives. Interestingly,though,the rise of the unattractive overnight successes was attributed more to personal relationships and less to ability than that of attractive overnight successes.
Why are attractive women not thought to be able?An attractive woman is thought to be more feminine and an attractive man more masculine(有男子气概的)than the less attractive ones. Thus,an attractive woman has an advantage in traditionally female jobs,but an attractive woman in a traditionally masculine position appears to lack the “masculine” qualities required.
This is true even in politics. “When the only clue is how he or she looks,people treat men and women differently,”says Anne Bowman,who recently published a study on the effects of attractiveness on political candidates. She asked 125 undergraduate students to rank two groups of photographs,one of men and one of women,in order of attractiveness. The students were told the photographs were of candidates for political offices. They were asked to rank them again,in the order they would vote for them.
The results showed that attractive males utterly defeated unattractive men,but the women who had been ranked most attractive invariably received the fewest votes.
小题1:The underlined word “liability”(in Para.1)most probably means “________”.
A.misfortune | B.instability | C.disadvantage | D.burden |
A.reinforces(加强)the feminine qualities required |
B.makes women look more honest and capable |
C.is of primary importance to women |
D.often enables women to succeed quickly |
A.turns out to be an obstacle to men |
B.affects men and women alike |
C.has as little effect on men as on women |
D.is more of an obstacle than a benefit to women |
A.practical | B.prejudiced | C.oldfashioned | D.pessimistic |
A.demand equal rights for women |
B.emphasize the importance of appearance |
C.discuss the negative aspects of being attractive |
D.give advice to jobseekers who are attractive |
To be a good thing, it has to have three properties: 1) It has to help reduce our dependence on oil, 2) It has to be no worse for the environment, and 3) It has to be economically practical.
Many of the things praised meet one or even two of those properties. Solar panels, for example. They can reduce our need for oil, at least in certain regions, and they’re certainly not bad for the environment. But they’re expensive. If you spend the money to make your home solar-powered, you probably won’t get back your costs for at least 15 years, which approaches the lifespan of the panels.
Certainly we need to clean up our act big time and find workable sources of alternative energy. But we also have to keep in mind that every one of these alternative-energy sources comes at a cost, which is something people seem to forget. They hear the phrase “alternative energy” and automatically assume it’s got to be good. But green isn’t always good, and oil isn’t always bad.
One seemingly “green” technology that pops up again and again is electric cars. It is praised by well-meaning people as good for the environment and a way to reduce our oil dependence, especially as oil prices continue to rise.
Electric cars are dirty. In fact, not only are they dirty, they might even be more dirty than their gasoline-powered cousins.
People in California love to talk about “ zero-emissions vehicles”, but people in California seem to be clueless about where electricity comes from. Power plants mostly use fire to make it. Aside from the new folks who have their roofs covered with solar cells, we get our electricity from generators. Generators are fueled by something---- usually coal, oil, but also by heat generated in nuclear power plants. There are a few wind farms and geothermal(地热的) plants as well, but by far we get electricity mainly by burning something.
In other words, those “zero-emissions” cars are likely coal-burning cars. It’s just because the coal is burned somewhere else that it looks clean. It is not. It’s as if the California Greens are covering their eyes ---- “ If I can’t see it, it’s not happening. “ Gasoline is an incredibly efficient way to power a vehicle; a gallon of gas has a lot of energy in it. But when you take that gas ( or another fue) and first use it to make electricity, you waste a nice part of that energy, mostly in the form of wasted heat ---- at the generator, through the transmission(传送) lines, etc.
A gallon of gas may propel your car 25 miles. But the electricity you get from that gallon of gas won’t get you nearly as far ---- so electric cars burn more fuel than gas- powered ones. If our electricity came mostly from nukes; or geothermal, or hydro, or solar, or wind, then an electric car truly would be clean. But for political, technical, and economic reasons, we don’t use much of those energy sources.
In addition, electric cars’ batteries which are poisonous for a long time will eventually end up in a landfill. And finally, when cars are the polluters, the pollution is spread across all the roads. When it’s a power plant, though, all the junk is in one lace. Nature is very good at cleaning up when things are too concentrated, but it takes a lot longer when all the garbage is in one spot.
小题1:Which of the following statements will the writer support?
A.Any kind of alternative energy is a good thing. |
B.Alternative energy is bound to take the place of oil. |
C.People should have an objective view towards alternative energy. |
D.Solar panel is a good example of alternative energy that meets three properties. |
A.People see the California Greens everywhere. |
B.People in California love to talk about zero-emissions vehicles. |
C.People in California love to have their roofs covered with solar cells. |
D.People there have no idea that so far electrically mainly comes from burning coal, oil, etc. |
A.Green technology is not always green. |
B.Alternative energy is economically practical. |
C.Electric cars are not clean at all. |
D.Gasoline is an efficient way to power a vehicle. |
A.are more environmentally friendly |
B.burn more fuel than gas-powered ones |
C.are very good at cleaning up when things are not too concentrated |
D.are poisonous for a long time and will eventually end up in a landfill |
A.being green is good and should be encouraged in communication |
B.electric cars are not clean in that we get electricity mainly by burning something |
C.zero-emissions vehicles should be chosen to protect our environment |
D.electric cars are now the dominant vehicle compared with gasoline-powered cousins |
The NanoManufacturing Institute (NMI), based in Leeds University, will play a key role in an EU project to construct the home by December 2010. The project, called “Intelligent Safe and Secure Buildings” (ISSB) is funded under the EU’s Sixth Framework program. This potentially life-saving scheme is led by German building manufacturer Knauf. The villa will be built in Amphilochia, in western Greece, where Knauf currently runs a manufacturing plant. If the experiment is successful, more tremor-resistant(防震)homes could be built in earthquake zones across the globe. NMI chief executive Professor Terry Wilkins said, “What we’re trying to achieve here is very exciting. We’re looking to use polymers in much tougher situations than ever before on a larger scale.” Monitors contained in the villa’s walls will be able to collect vast amounts of data about the building over time. Wireless sensors(传感器) will record any stresses and vibrations, as well as temperature, humidity and gas levels.
The walls are to be built from new load-bearing steel frames and high-strength gypsum(石膏)board. Prof Wilkins said, “If there are any problems, the intelligent sensor network will be able to alert residents immediately so they have time to escape. If whole groups of houses are so constructed, we could use a larger network of sensors to get even more information. If the house falls down, we have got hand-held devices that can be used over the ruins to pick out where the embedded(嵌入的)sensors are hidden to get some information about how the villa collapsed. Also, we can get information about anyone who may be around, so it potentially becomes a tool for rescue.”
小题1:The aim of the passage is to ________.
A.report a piece of interesting news |
B.promote tremor-resistant homes |
C.inform us of the nanotechnology development |
D.tell us something about a tremor-resistant home |
A.it will be built on a special place |
B.the cracks in its walls can be healed by the polymers |
C.the special particles can make its walls stronger |
D.the intelligent sensor network can tell people where there is a crack |
A.rescue work can be done more quickly and accurately |
B.the intelligent sensor network will stop working |
C.no one can be hurt in the earthquake |
D.a warning signal will be given to other residents |
A.he is doubtful about the project |
B.he thinks the tremor-resistant home is perfectly designed |
C.he is confident in the tremor-resistant home |
D.the tremor-resistant home still needs to be tested in a real situation |
A.is still being tried out |
B.is already under construction |
C.has been in wide use |
D.will be put into wide use soon |
"Everyone knows the planet is in bad shape," thundered a magazine article last year. Species are being driven to die out at record rates, and the rivers are so poisonous that fish are floating on the surface, dead.
But there"s a growing belief that what everyone takes for granted is wrong: things are actually getting better. A new book is about to overturn our most basic assumptions about the world"s environment. Rivers, seas, rain and the atmosphere are all getting cleaner. The total amount of forests in the world is not declining. The Skeptical Environmentalist by Bjorn Lomborg, professor of statistics at the University of Aarhus in Denmark, is an attack on the misleading claims of environmental groups, and the "bad news" culture that makes people believe everything is getting worse.
Now the attacks are increasingly coming from left-wing environmentalists such as Lomborg, a former member of Greenpeace. The accusation is that, although the environment is improving, green groups — with profits of hundreds of mil-lions of pounds a year — are using scare tactics(谋略)to gain donations. Lomborg"s book doesn"t deny global warming — probably the biggest environmental threat — but destroys almost every other environmental claim with many official statistics.
The Worldwatch Institute claims that "deforestation(沙漠化) has been accelerating over the last 30 years". But Lomborg says that is simply rubbish. Since the dawn of agriculture the world has lost about 20 per cent of its forest cover, but in recent decades the forest area"s depleting has come to a stop. According to UN figures, the area of forests has remained almost steady, at about 30 per cent of total land area, since the 1940s. Forests in countries such as the US, the UK and Canada have actually been expanding over the past 40 years. Despite all the warnings the Amazon rainforest has only shrunk by about 15 per cent.
Nor are all our species dying out. Some campaigners claim that 50 per cent of all species will have died out within 50 years. But other studies show only 0.08 per cent of species are dying out each year. Conservation efforts have been successful. Whales are no longer threatened and the bald eagle is off the endangered list.
Environmental groups claim that many of the improvements are the results of the success of their campaigns. Stephen Tindale, director of Greenpeace UK, said, "There are important examples, such as acid rain and ozone, where things aren"t as bad as predicted, and that"s because behavior has changed."
小题1:In his book, The Skeptical Environmentalist, what is Lomborg"s main argument?
A.Our planet is in bad shape. |
B.The world"s environment is improving. |
C.The total amount of forests in the world is not declining. |
D.Conservation efforts have been successful. |
A.They scared people into making donations. |
B.They overturned our basic assumptions about the world"s environment. |
C.They changed their behavior toward the environment. |
D.They only told people bad news about the environment. |
A.reducing | B.limiting | C.expanding | D.accelerating |
A.The total area of forests in the world has increased significantly. |
B.The effects of global warming are not as bad as first expected. |
C.It appears that the bald eagle will now survive. |
D.In the last 50 years the number of whales has increased. |
However, many students won’t do well in an open classroom. For these students, they will do little in school if there are too few rules. They will not make good use of open education, which is so different from traditional class, because they may have a problem getting used to making so many choices on their own. For them it is important to have some rules to direct them. They may worry about the rules even when there are no rules. In addition to that, some traditional teachers do not believe in open education and do not like it either.
Since both of some good points and bad points of the open education have been explained clearly, you may have your own opinion on the issue. Personally, I think that the concept of open education is good only in theory. In actual fact, it may not work very well in a real class or school. I believe, most students, but of course not all students, need some structure in their classes. They may want and need to have rules.
In some cases, they must be made to study some subjects. Many students are pleased to find subjects they have to study interesting. They would not study those subjects if they did not have to.
小题1:Open education allows the students to_________________.
A.grow as the educated |
B.be responsible for their life |
C.discover subjects outside class |
D.develop their own interests |
A.worry about grades and rules |
B.aren’t used to making choices |
C.do well in a traditional classroom |
D.enjoy having some rules in class |
A.there are too many rules |
B.they don’t like activities |
C.there are too few rules |
D.they worry about the rules |
A.Open education is a really complex idea. |
B.Open education is better than traditional education. |
C.Traditional teachers don’t believe in open education. |
D.The writer thinks open education is practical. |
最新试题
- 1程序的输出结果为( )A.3,4B.7,7C.7,8D.7,11
- 2方程x2-2x+m-1=0的一根是-1,则m=______.
- 3与蚯蚓的形态结构特征不符的一项是 ( )A.个体呈辐射对称B.身体有许多体节构成C.有真体腔D.以蠕动的方式运
- 4函数,若实数a,b满足f(a)+f(b-1)=0,则a+b=[ ]A.-1B.0C.1D.不确定
- 5He pretended ________ me when he walked by.A.to not seeB.not
- 6世界上面积最小的洲是( )A.南极洲B.欧洲C.大洋洲D.非洲
- 7已知一个圆经过直线和圆的两个交点,且有最小面积,求此圆的方程.
- 8(本小题满分12分)已知数列满足,.⑴求证:数列是等比数列,并写出数列的通项公式;⑵若数列满足,求的值.
- 9将方程化成的形式是( )A.B.C.D.
- 10如图,ABCD是正方形,O是正方形的中心, PO⊥底面ABCD,E是PC的中点.求证: (1)PA//平面BDE;(2)
热门考点
- 1阅读下列材料,回答问题:材料一 大海给了我们茫茫无定、浩浩无际和渺渺无限的观念。人类在大海的无限里感到他自己的无限的时候
- 2 下列句子中加点词语的使用,恰当的一句是( )A.为了帮助别人找到丢失的东西,我虽然迟到了半个小时,但我一点也不悔恨。
- 3“地球自个儿也在转”产生的现象是( )A.四季冷暖差异B.昼夜长短变化C.五带的划分D.昼夜更替
- 4—Is this your pencil?—No, ________. It’s his pencil.A.it is
- 5如图,质量都是m的物体A、B用轻质弹簧相连,静置于水平地面上,此时弹簧压缩了。如果再给A一个竖直向下的力,使弹簧再压缩,
- 6配制一定体积、一定物质的量浓度的溶液,下列操作会使配得的溶液浓度偏小的是( )A.容量瓶中原有少量蒸馏水B.定容时观察
- 7阅读下列资料,回答问题。(1)说出A区域的生态问题及其引发的次生环境问题。_______________________
- 8下列有关神经系统结构和功能的叙述正确的是[ ]A.兴奋在神经纤维上以局部电流的形式传导B.若刺激传出神经,可在传
- 9李明仗着学过武术,经常恃强凌弱。这天放学,他又用语言伤害张强。如果你碰巧遇到这事,你会[ ]①联合几名同学和李明
- 10为了增强植物抗倒伏的能力,应该施用钾肥.下列物质属于钾肥的是( )A.CO(NH2)2B.KClC.Ca3(PO4)2