题目

辩论debate：动物有没有语言.我是反方.其实这个是我们专业课上的一个小辩论,英语辩论.
所以要是有朋友能给出我英文的理由最好哈,但是中文 的也可以,我需要从哪里入手来驳对方的观点：动物有语言.

提问时间：2021-02-15

答案

反方论点为“动物没有语言”难度很大,因为站在正方角度来看：
1.人也是动物.难道说人没有语言?
因此,反方必须回避正方攻击这个要害,将动物与人在定义上区分来.可以这样：Our defination for animal is those animals rather than human being, otherwise it's a nonsense for us to discuss this topic by using language.
2. 动物是有语言的,这一点毫无异议,正方可以举出很多实例来,比如蜜蜂的舞蹈,海豚的超声波等.
因此,反方必须防守,缩小语言的定义,排除肢体语言等,限定为口腔部位.同时要想法将所谓语言（language）区别于声音(sound）；这样一旦正方举出以上类似例子时,反方就可反驳：Bee's dancing is not a language, but a symbol written in the air by bee's flying; dolphin uses a kind of ultrasonic that emit from its airbag system which located in its forehead instead of its mouth. It's a kind of sound just like our clapping sound, frog's belly sound, rattlesnake's tale flipping sound, criket's wings waving sound.
3. 这个辩论,反方宜以防守为主,进攻可能反而不利.若只是为练英语,就不要进攻了,只防守就行.若是辩论技巧也要评分的话,只好少量进攻,比如“语言应具备以下特点：1.有表达意识it shall have expression consciousness；2.以交流为目的the purpose is for communication instead of hunting like bat；3.成体系 it has its system instead of random sound, otherwise the sound of raining is a language, oh, no, it's just a random sound from nature. 4.使用嘴部发音器官using a series of sound emit parts, such as lips, tongue, throat, vocal cords
为这道题翻了好多资料,真的很辛苦,请多加点分哦,5分的话就太……