题目

1.A computer ＿CPU,main board and some other parts
A.is made up B.is consisted of C.made up of D.consists of
2.Before ＿a room,you should knock at the door first.
A.enter B.go into C.entering into D.entering
3.I thought ＿very important to take exercise every day.
A.its B.it C.it's D.this
不是it is+adj.+to do sth )
4＿could do suchu a thing?
A.Whom do you think B.Who do you think C.Do you think who D.Do you think whom
(宾格不是用whom?)
5.—Are these enough for you all?—I'm afraid not.＿are needed.
A.Much more B.Many more C.More many D.Too much
(much 不是加比较级吗?）
6.I hope your friends ＿Shanghai soon.
A.to visit B.to pay a visit ）C.can be able to visit D.will visit
7.＿will be the population of China in the year 2010?
A.What B.How many C.How much D.Which
(数量不是用how much吗?如How much is one plus one )

提问时间：2020-10-20

答案

1.D
固定短语：consist of = be made up of 由...组成
所以此题答案还可以是：is made up of
2.D
enter是及物动词,其后可以直接加宾语a room,无须另加介词into,排除C；
before在此句中为介词,所以其后加动名词短语作其宾语,而不能直接跟动词原形,排除AB.
3.B/C
此题中,it可以做形式宾语,真正宾语是不定式短语to take exercise every day,而very important是宾语补足语.
如果用楼上所说的句型“it is + adj.+ to do sth”,考虑到主句的谓语动词是过去式thought,此时宾语从句的时态也必须相应改成一般过去时,所以is要改成was才对,不过缩写成it's也是可以的.
不过,我估计C答案是it is,只不过被楼主打错了而已.
4 B
do you think在语法中被称之为插入语,它只对问句的句序有影响,而对句子的其他语法结构无任何影响.
所以,该题可以改为：____ could do such a thing?
故需要选入的代词其实还是做问句的主语.
另外：如果该问句理解成do you think的宾语从句的话,则选项还是必须做宾语从句____ could do such a thing的主语,所以答案还只能是who.(即从句才做宾语,而单词who是不做think的宾语,而做宾语从句的主语).
5.B
much的确可以修饰比较级,但是它所修饰的是形容词/副词的比较级.而如果用more表示（不能直接加-er表示比较级的）形容词/副词比较级的话,其后的题目中却没有出现任何的形容词/副词.
所以此题的more做代词,相当于名词,根据谓语的a复数形式are,可以看出more所指代的是“更多的某东西（可数名词）”.即more = more + 可数名词复数.
此题所用的固定搭配是：many more (+可数名词复数）或 much more (+不可数名词）
楼主可以想象一下类似的短语：two more apples.此时的many对应表数量的two,而如果上下文提到了apples的话,可以直接用more代替more apples.
6.D
没有hope sb to do sth的短语（wish有）,排除AB；
can和be able to同义,两者一般不可以连用,排除C；
所以答案用hope加上省略that的宾语从句,从句用一般将来时.
pay a visit to sw = go on a visit to sw = visit sw 参观某地
注：前两个短语中的visit是名词,而最后的visit是动词.
7.A
如果是对population提问,英语语法规定只能用what或how large,而不能用how much.
其实population/number/amout是问“大小”的,而不是问“多少”的.这一点类似于用high/low,而不是expensive/cheap来修饰price一样.