题目

动词后面加介词?
补是说.不及物动词后面加介词,但后面要有宾语的么?这几个是怎么回事么?
penguins are taken good care of in New Zealand.
Young trees should be （a.taken good care.【a.taken good care b.take good of c.looking after well d.well looked after】）
为什么一个加一个不加of呢?
however,his parents won't allow him to trains as much as he would like to.
为啥加to呢?
old people should be spoken to.为什么有to?
the teacher was reading when he came in未什么加in
与上面无关
i agree ( )what he said 这里使用in,on,还是with?

提问时间：2020-07-21

答案

（别着急,希望我的解答令你的困惑烟消云散：）
一,关于“penguins are taken good care of in New Zealand.
Young trees should be （a.taken good care.【a.taken good care b.take good of c.looking after well d.well looked after】）
为什么一个加一个不加of呢?”
两个句子的of都不能少.即第二个句子的正确选项是d.well looked after,而不是你说的a.taken good care.
凡是（不及物）动词后面加了介词,所组成的动词短语,改为被动语态时,这些介词都要一一保留,不能删去.这是许多学生容易出的差错.
二,关于“however,his parents won't allow him to trains as much as he would like to.
为啥加to呢?”
这是简略句.像这类like to/would like to/would love to 等简略句,带有不定式,当要承前省略时,要保留不定式的标志to.楼主请看下面的对话：
---Tom,I am going to the theater this afternoon.Would you like to go with me?
---I‘d love【 to】.But I am have to stay at home to do my homework.
三.关于“old people should be spoken to.为什么有to?”
这个问题同“第一题”,不再累述.
四,关于“the teacher was reading when he came in为什么加in”
这里的in是副词,而非前面所说的介词,与前面所说的是两回事.come in 和come out 一样,可以单独使用而不用带宾语.这里省去in也通,只是意思不一样.come in 是“进来”的意思,如果没有in,就是“来”的意思.有in没in意思不同,看你要表示何种意思.
五,关于“ agree ( )what he said 这里使用in,on,还是with?”
with 是对的.agree with what he said 是“同意他说的话”的意思.
（如再有疑问,敬请垂询,）